Implementation Basics for Civil Protection Order Portals
- This event has passed.
Description
Join us as we explore the key strategies for successfully implementing court portal technology. Panelists will provide valuable insights into the essential considerations that ensure successful deployment and ongoing effectiveness of these innovative legal tools.
Topics Covered:
- Understanding current business processes to inform the design and integration of portals.
- Collaborating with traditional and non-traditional stakeholders to foster successful implementation.
- Providing effective user support to help individuals navigate the portals and access the protection they need.
- Reviewing the legal considerations and frameworks to ensure compliance and integrity.
- Assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of the portals in serving users.
- Analyzing funding considerations that can support the development and maintenance of portals.
This webinar is ideal for judges, court and other legal professionals, advocates, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology and civil protection orders. Join us to equip yourself with the knowledge needed to navigate the complexities of CPO portal implementation! This webinar is part of the Civil Protection Order Portal Technical Assistance Project. We are seeking courts to participate as Learner Courts to pilot recommended guidance for virtual civil protection order processes. Technical assistance and funding are provided. Apply by April 30 to be considered.
Moderator: Yanitza Madrigal, Senior Court Management Consultant, NCSC
Panelists:
- Elsa Robbins, Technical Business Analyst, Arizona Supreme Court
- Melissa Arvin, Family Violence Resource Attorney, Indiana Office of Court Services
- Sarah Hoskinson, Director of Access to Justice, Kansas Office of Judicial Administration
- Ayyoub Ajmi, Director of Technology, CiviLaw.Tech
For more information, email Sarah Vandenberg Van Zee.
This project was supported by Grant No. 15JOVW-23-GK-05485-MUMU awarded by the Office of Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women.
OVW approved!